Adnan NYT

The Judge and Jury Agreed I Didn’t Kill Anyone. So Why Did I Just Serve 16 Years For Murder?

By Adnan Khan | June 22, 2019
New York Times

In 2003, Adnan Khan committed a robbery in which one of his accomplices unexpectedly killed their victim. The prosecutors, judge and jury all agreed Khan did not plan or commit the murder. Yet he was still sentenced as if he had — and given a life sentence.

The reason is the felony murder rule, an arcane piece of legal doctrine that allows all accomplices to be held equally responsible for deaths that happen in the committing of a felony.

Researchers estimate as many as one in five people serving long life sentences did not actually kill anyone.

In this video Op-Ed, Khan argues that it is time for the felony murder rule to be changed in every state, as it was in California last year. One of the basic principles of a fair justice system is that you are punished for the crimes you commit, not those committed by other people.

TOP STORIES
RELATED STORIES
RECENT TWEETS

Wrap up your #GivingTuesday by reading some powerful words of gratitude from the San Quentin community to those who supported our care package program.

https://www.mttamcollege.org/givingtuesday2021/

It's an honor to share this video by MTC student Jessie Rose, thanking our supporters who made such a difference in the lives of incarcerated people during the pandemic. May your #GivingTuesday be full of gratitude. https://vimeo.com/651325059

These care packages at San Quentin during endless lockdowns made a huge difference in so many lives thanks to Mount Tamalpais College ⁦@MtTamCollege⁩ https://www.mttamcollege.org/givingtuesday2021/